9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (12) TMI 658X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... D. Vyas, Addl. G. P. a/w Ms. P. N. Diwan, AGP. For the Respondent No. 3: Mr. Karan Adik a/w Mr. S. D. Deshpande. PC.:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner had already made it clear on 8 October 2024 that the Petitioner would not press for any relief in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) of this petition. Accordingly, Mr. Rastogi has made no ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the present Petition is the only remedy available to the Petitioner." 6. The averments in the above paragraph are blissfully vague and general. In the amended paragraphs, there is a reference to the failure of natural justice. We have heard Mr. Rastogi, and we are not satisfied that this is a matter where we should depart from the usual rules / practice of exhaustion of alternate remedies. T ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... present case, we decline to entertain this petition. This is not a case of no notice or no opportunity but at the highest, if the allegations made are to be accepted as correct, this is a case of inadequate notice and inadequate opportunity. 9. This petition was filed almost a year after the impugned orders were made, i.e. much after the statutory period of appeal provided had expired. There is n ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... art from the usual rule of exhaustion of alternate remedies. Besides, we note that the prayer clauses in this petition are vague, and even the amendments that were made to the petition are very confusing. Though these are not grounds on which we are declining to entertain this petition, we must note that the petitions must contain proper details. The prayer clause must refer to the precise orders ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
