TMI Blog1975 (8) TMI 47X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ollector of the Central Excise and the appellate order passed thereon imposing a duty on the petitioner to the extent of Rs 17,340.73 p. for manufacture and surreptitious removal of excisable goods without being shown in the statutory accounts. The petitioner preferred an appeal and the appeal having been dismissed, the petitioner moved a revisional application which is still pending. `While the r ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nst the petitioner. 3. In my opinion, in view of the facts as stated here-in-before and in the facts of this, the demand should not be executed pending the disposal of the revisional application. I, therefore, direct that the revisional application be disposed of by the respondents as soon as practicable and pending the disposal of the revisional application under Section 36 of the Central Excise ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|