Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1987 (1) TMI 96

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ties were taking a view that the same was not includible in the assessable value. Thereafter, in 1983, a sort of instruction was issued inter-departmentally to the Collector (Appeals) to include the said value in the assessable value for the purpose of charge of excise duty. 3. It is asserted that the petitioners have been submitting their price lists from time to time and the same were being approved right till end of July, 1986, in these price lists the petitioners did not include the value of the aforesaid four-year service contract. At the same time it appears, that the Excise department, in spite of the earlier instructions not to include the said value, had been issuing show cause notices from time; to time as to why such value shou .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... arrangement made by the Bombay High Court "under protest." So far as the petitioners are concerned, they have challenged the very vires of instructions, dated 27th October, 1983 followed by 14th April, 1986, before us. 8. It is conceded by learned Additional Solicitor General that such administrative instructions as were issued are not binding on quasi-judicial judicial Tribunals in the discharge of their quasi-judicial functions. Therefore, before the Collector (Appeals), the appeal has to be decided without reference to the "Administrative Instructions", on the plain wording and scope of Section 4(4) of the aforesaid Act. 9. Learned Additional Solicitor General also placed reliance on the observations of the Supreme Court in the case .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... re collecting additional duty from the customers for the first time and then depositing it. The case of the petitioners is that they have not collected the Additional duty demanded from their customers till the orders of the Assistant Collector, which is under appeal, and thereafter the petitioners in view of the orders of the Assistant Collector are collecting from the consumers and depositing it with the excise authorities. 13. If at this stage the petitioners are called upon to pay the demand in pursuance of the orders of the Assistant Collector, which is subject matter of appeal before the Collector (Appeals), they will be called upon to, in fact, pay to the Central Excise Authorities an amount which they had not collected. Even the o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates