9911796707
TMI Blog1986 (1) TMI 120X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mber 1985 issued by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta, against Vishwa Industrial Company Private Limited, the petitioner herein. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner assembled haulages and conveyors in the premises of the buyers. The assembly is of components which are manufactured and on which excise duty is paid. At the time of erection and/or installation of haula ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tice and in course of hearing the petitioner felt aggrieved and has moved this writ petition. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents have declined to give particulars on the basis of which it has calculated the short-levy. The petitioner has further alleged that the entire proceeding is barred by limitation. My attention was invited to the case of S.S. Gadgil v. Lal Company, 53 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... not deciding the questions that have been raised finally. All those questions will have to be gone into and decided by the statutory authority. 3. The petitioners have also made a grievance about the non-supply of the particulars on the basis of which the claim has been made against the petitioners. 4. The petitioners have alleged that they have been handicapped in presenting their case becau ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
