9911796707
TMI Blog1991 (7) TMI 98X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tobacco. A dispute arose whether duty is leviable on his product or not. A communication dated 6-12-1990 from the Asstt. Collector followed by a communication dated 10-12-1990 from the Superintendent, Central Excise was sent to the petitioner holding that the petitioner's product is dutiable. He filed writ petition No. 6 of 1991 for quashing the said communications. Pending the writ petition he w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d a show cause notice and the matter is now pending. 2. While so, the petitioner applied to the authority to return the sale deed and the Fixed Deposit Receipts deposited by him pursuant to the order of this Court dated 3-1-1991 made in the said writ petition on the ground that this writ petition has since been allowed. The authority declined to do so whereupon he approached this Court by way of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ner pursuant to the interlocutory order dated 3-1-1991 made in Civil Misc. Writ No. 6 of 1991, be returned to the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before the Assistant Collector, Central Excise, Farrukhabad. Civil Misc. Writ No. of 1991 (Notice No. 1558) M/s. Ravindra Co. v. Collector of Central Excise and Another. Th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
