9911796707
TMI Blog1990 (7) TMI 133X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... referred to as "the Act") by the Collector of Central Excise. Despite valid service of notice, opposite party has not entered appearance. 2. Opposite party filed an application in form AL-4 prescribed under Rule 174 of the Central Excise Rules for a licence to manufacture Ferro Silicon/Charge Chrome in its factory at Therumbal. On that basis licence in Form AL-4 was granted. When it came to noti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ions of law as framed are as follows : (1) "Whether the factory should furnish information against Col. 6 of the Schedule of AL-4 application, the quantity of goods the factory is legally capable of producing with reference to the Registration Certificate and the productive capacity as mentioned in the Registration Certificate issued under Section 10 of the I.D.R.A.? Whether in the Col. provided ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... at no power having been vested with authorities under the Act to take into account the provision of Industrial Development Regulation Act, there is no scope for any doubt or dispute about it. Coming to the conclusion that conclusion is obvious, the first question was decided not to be referred. 5. As regards the second question, Tribunal was also held to be too obvious for which no reference is ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ithin the scope of having arose out of the order. Tribunal does not seem to have kept the aforesaid principle while refusing to state a case. Thus refusal was not justified. Next, what would be the interpretation of the provisions of a statute to give jurisdiction to a statutory authority unless finally settled by the Supreme Court or the High Court to which such reference is sought for, cannot be ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
