9911796707
TMI Blog1993 (6) TMI 80X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f Import-Export Policy of April 1978 to March 1979. The application made to the Chief Controller of Imports and Exports was rejected by order dated August 30, 1978 on the ground that the petitioner failed to diversify exports. The petitioner preferred Writ Petition No. 1458 of 1979 to this Court and by decision of one of us (Pendse, J.), reported in 1984 (17) E.L.T. 106 (Narendra Mafatlal Mehta v. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n the ground that the import was unauthorised. The petitioner filed writ petition in Calcutta High Court to challenge the action of the respondents and the Calcutta High Court stayed show cause notice issued by the department and directed clearance of the goods on petitioner's furnishing a bank guarantee. It is not in dispute that the goods were cleared by the petitioner and disposed of. 4. The ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er, submitted that the proceedings commenced by show cause notice has become redundant because the imported goods are already disposed of by the petitioner in pursuance of the order passed by the Calcutta High Court. The show cause notice issued by the respondents is merely for the purpose as to why the petitioner should not be directed to hand over the imported goods to canalising agency. As the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
