1995 (3) TMI 113

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... or of Central Excise, [1992 (61) E.L.T. 3] and O.N.G.C. v. Collector of Central Excise, [1994 (70) E.L.T. 45], the disputes between the parties, who are a Central Government company and a department of the Central Government, have been referred to a committee. On 30th November, 1994 this court took notice of the reference and adjourned the appeals by two months stating that if no decision was take .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... re, the appellant should be permitted to argue the appeals. That does not appear to us to be permissible having regard to the fact that the disputes were, as aforesaid, referred to and resolved by the committee and it has resolved that the appellant would withdraw the appeals filed in the Supreme Court. Since the appallant's counsel has no instructions to withdraw the appeals, we shall proceed to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X