1997 (7) TMI 162

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... herein, rejecting the claim for refund preferred by the petitioners. 2. The short question raised by Mr. C.N. Korde, learned Counsel for the petitioners, is that the Bill of Entry was dated 22nd June, 1984 and as such the rates of Customs Duty as prevailing on that date would be applicable. However, the Customs Department wrongly levied the rates as stipulated in the Notification dated 28th June .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... statement nor have they questioned the bona fides or good faith of the respondents. We, therefore, accept the statement of the Customs Department as communicated, which is on the basis of official record and we do not propose to go into the question as raised by the learned Counsel for the petitioners. 4. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner also approached the Tribunal constitute .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X