2001 (6) TMI 65

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... counsels, the writ appeals are taken up for joint final disposal. 2.The appellants herein filed the writ petitions challenging the validity of Clause (4) of the Notification No. 59 of 1994 Central Excise dated 1-3-1994. The learned Single Judge upheld the validity of the said Clause. Both the learned Counsels agreed that the validity of the said Clause has also been upheld by the Apex Court. Hen .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... use had been interpreted and the claim of the appellants had been negatived on the short ground that they are using the brand name of others for their commodities and as such, the appellants are not entitled for the exemption. 4.Before us, it is claimed that the each appellant is separate entity and having separate manufacturing units; some are manufacturing identical goods and others are manufa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ty. 6.Though the learned Single Judge had decided the issue on merits, and had given a finding, since the adjudicating authority had not applied his mind, and decided the question, and also we having found that the matter has to go back to the adjudicating authority for proper consideration as to the disputed question of facts, it is necessary that the findings of the learned Single Judge on thi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X