2001 (8) TMI 125

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... whether the printing press imported by the appellant had an output of 30,000 or more copies per hour. 2. The appellant in support of this claim, for availing the benefit of notification dated 19th June, 1980, relied upon a certificate which had been issued by one Mr. S.S. Doshi and also on a certificate issued by I.I.T., Madras. According to these certificates, the capability of the machine was .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the machine and then given their opinion with regard to the capacity of the printing press imported by the appellant. Instead of remanding the cases, we direct, the Collector of Customs to get personally inspected the machines in question and then submit a report to this Court with regard to the validity of the claim of the appellant in respect of the capacity of the imported machines. Inasmuch as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X