TMI Blog2001 (3) TMI 113X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ise Act, 1944 (in short, 'the Act'). 2. When the matter was placed for admission, we pointed out to learned counsel for the petitioner that this High Court does not have jurisdiction to deal with the matter, in view of the decision of this Court in Seth Banarsi Dass Gupta v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) [1978 (113) ITR 817]. In the said case, white dealing with the scope of entertaining r ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... expressed similar view in Central Excise Act Case No. 7 of 2000 disposed of on 30-10-2000 taking note of decision of the Apex Court in Stridewell Leather (P) Ltd. v. Bhankerpur Simbhaoli Beverages (P) Ltd. [AIR 1994 SC 158], while dealing with the scope of expression "the High Court" under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 (in short, the Companies Act'). 3. We find no substance in the plea o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|