2002 (4) TMI 83

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rst respondent is engaged in the manufacture of motor vehicle parts. It claimed Modvat credit in respect of various items including grinding wheels. The Assessee's claim was rejected by the Deputy Commissioner. However, on appeal, the claim was allowed. The Revenue challenged the order before the Tribunal. The appeal was dismissed. The Revenue has now filed this petition under Section 35H(1) of th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ew of the above, the position that emerges is that if the two products are treated as inputs, the assessee is entitled to Modvat credit under Rule 57-A. However, if these are excluded from inputs by virtue of the Explanation and are included in the category of machines etc., then the Modvat credit shall be admissible under Rule 57-Q. In the ultimate analysis, the credit is admissible. Resultantly, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X