9911796707
TMI Blog1996 (4) TMI 139X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the petitioner and Mr. Shishir Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. In view of the fact that nine writ petitions have already been heard and decided by this Court involving the same question of law and fact, they both have agreed that this writ petition may also be heard and decided at the admission stage. 3. The petitioner being a U.P. State Cement Corporation (Public Limited ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to 2 per cent of the losses. The assessee felt aggrieved and filed a bunch of 12 writ petitions in this Court. Out of these, nine writ petitions nos. 1785/93, 1786/93, 1787/93, 1788/93, 1789/93, 1790/93, 1791/93, 915/95 and 916/95 were heard and allowed by a common judgment dated 18-12-1995 by Hon'ble M.C. Agarwal, J [1996 (86) E.L.T. 6 (All)]. This Court has held that the loss of cement clinkers ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s and need not repeat the same reasons which have been recorded by Hon'ble Mr. C. Agarwal, J. with whom I fully agree. 6. Consequently this writ petition is also hereby allowed. Notices issued under Section 11 of the Act are discharged and the Assistant Collector's order dated 30-3-92, and the order dated 6-11-92 passed by the Collector (Appeals) Customs and Central Excise, Allahabad and the orde ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
