9911796707
TMI Blog2005 (9) TMI 97X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to the patients who are generally of rural background and of limited economic resources. The petitioner, for various medical diagnostic and treatment, had imported medical equipments claiming benefit of exemption under Ministry of Defence (Department of Revenue) notification No. 64/88-Cus., dated 1-3-1988. In order to obtain exemption under the aforesaid notification, petitioner was required to o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... -2001. Aggrieved by the same, petitioner is before this Court. 3.Apart from others, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would contend, that before passing the impugned order, the respondent authorities had neither issued any show cause notice to the petitioner directing it to show cause why the certificate issued earlier for import of machinery should not be cancelled nor had afforded ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tificate, the customs duty had not been imposed on the machineries imported. 6.Now the respondent authorities are of the view that the petitioner has not complied with the terms and conditions of the notification. Therefore, they have cancelled the eligibility certificate issued earlier. In my opinion, the respondent authorities, without issuing a show cause notice to the petitioner directing it ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... order passed by the respondent authorities dated 31-10-2000 is set aside. III. However, liberty is reserved to the respondent authorities, if they so desire, to pass a fresh order after issuing an appropriate show cause notice to the petitioner and after affording it a reasonable opportunity of hearing. IV. All the other contentions of the petitioner are left open. Ordered accordin ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
