9911796707
TMI Blog2006 (6) TMI 120X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... petitioners Impugned orders dated 5-10-2005 and dated 5-12-2005 passed by respondent No. 2-Customs, Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( for short "Tribunal"). The Tribunal directed the petitioner to pre-deposit Rs. 25,00,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five lakhs) within a period of eight weeks and report compliance thereof on 5-12-2005 as condition precedent to entertain the appeal as required under Sect ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... notices served on them. They urged that the demand was not proper and correct. The respondent No. 3 assessed them for tax liability and directed them to pay excise duty of Rs. 1,00,32,600/- (Rs. One crore thirty two thousand six hundred). They preferred separate appeals against the order of respondent No. 3 in respect of the demand for excise duty. The Tribunal directed them to pre-deposit an amou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... impugned orders. It is pertinent to note that the Tribunal has observed that prima facie the duty demand of Rs. 54,45,358/- (Rs. Fifty Four Lakhs Forty Five Thousand Three Hundred Fifty Eight) on account of clearance by misdeciaring the goods as supply of software design charges could be recovered from the petitioners. It is for such reason that pre-deposit of Rs. 25,00,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Lak ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... -deposit of Rs. 25,00,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Lakhs). There is no discussion regarding particulars of plea raised by the appellants in this behalf, consideration thereof by the Tribunal and application of judicial mind to such a submission. The petitioners have relied upon tax audit report and have inter alia contended that the Textile Unit is running in losses. The Tribunal has not assigned any re ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
