TMI Blog2007 (5) TMI 253X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dated 10-4-2007 passed by Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in Appeal No. 3794/2006. By the impugned order, the Tribunal has dismissed the appeal filed by the present appellant on the ground that by its earlier order dated 18-1-2007, the appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 10 lacs as pre-deposit for hearing of the appeal in question. The appellant, thereafter requeste ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hat the order passed by the Tribunal dated 18-1-2007 by which the appellants were directed to deposit Rs. 10 lacs for hearing the appeal was never challenged by the appellant, Mr. Singhvi has ultimately agreed after taking instructions from his client that appellant is ready and willing to deposit Rs. 10 lacs within stipulated period and requested that the appeal may be directed to be decided on m ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of Rs. 10 lacs by way of pre-deposit for deciding the appeal before the Tribunal we are not framing substantial question of law at the time of disposing of the appeal. However, we make it clear that this order may not be treated as precedent in any other case as this order is passed in view of concession given by both the learned Counsel in this appeal. 5. In our view, since learned Counsel for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|