2005 (5) TMI 88

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... iling an appeal under Section 35H of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (the Act). 2. The Appellant is aggrieved by an order dated 15th February, 2000 passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT). According to the Appellant, the order was received on 24th May, 2000. 3. The limitation period for filing an appeal under Section 35H of the Act is six months. The appeal sho .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e asked the learned Government counsel to produce the original files. Some file was produced dealing with some transfers, but not the relevant file pertaining to this appeal. 7. The impugned order is hardly of two pages and it merely follows an earlier decision given by the Tribunal in the case of Faridabad Tolls Pvt. Limited v. CCE, Delhi, 1993 (63) E.L.T. 759 (Tribunal). Why it took the Appell .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X