Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1991 (1) TMI 165

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n application. He also quoted extensively from various case laws as summarised below :- 2. Proviso to Rule 12(1) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 makes specific provisions for Collector to condone all or any of the conditions laid down in any notification issued under this rule if the substantial condition of export has been fulfilled. In this regard the Tribunal has also held that the Collector is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nder Rule 56A(7) only because there had been a delay (not attributable to the appellants) in obtaining the necessary permissions. Unlike Rule 12, there are no provisions in Rule 56A for condonation of procedural lapses, but the Tribunal held that the procedures having been substantially followed benefit to the assessee be granted. 4. Again, in a case of drawback, the Tribunal held that drawback .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... No. 201/79 [Chemicals and Plastics India Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise - 1988 (36) E.L.T. 651 (T)]. 7. A number of other judgments were also quoted by the respondents from where it is clear that where substantial compliance with procedure is made the benefit may be given. 8. It is observed from the above discussion of the case law that wherever there is a substantial compliance with the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ber by the department itself was to deny a rightful claim, if otherwise due to a party who had acted bona fide in the interregnum and kept the Department informed by way of filing the claims. In this case the party had applied for registration on 17-11-1986 and it was given registration on 6-11-1989. In the absence of any such registration number, party naturally failed to understand, what could b .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n of the party for the year 1986 was notified and the Department cannot escape responsibility. 11. Government, therefore, holds that non-registration or non-renewal alone should not stand in the way of grant of rebate. Therefore, if otherwise the rebates are due the same should be allowed to the party in terms of Notification No. 409/86 as actually allowed by the Collector (Appeals). 12. Accordi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates