1999 (3) TMI 101

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... issioner (Appeals), Mumbai. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the Asstt. Commissioner of Central Excise, Division X, Mumbai-II rejected the refund claim of Rs. 1 lakh filed by the applicant. The refund claim arose on account of export through bond in terms of Rule 57F(4) of the CER, 1944 and consequential claim of the input credit unutilised under the Modvat rules. The Commissione .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X