Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2000 (7) TMI 158

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as imposed. Penalty of Rs. 5,000.00 each has been imposed respectively on S/Shri G.D. Saini, Vice-President and B.K. Biyani, Managing Director, of M/s. Usha Beltron Limited. 3Arguing on the appeals, Shri S.K. Bagaria, learned. Advocate submitted that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Jelly Filled Underground Telecommunication Cables. For manufacture of their said product, they procured one of their raw materials, 'Cable Filling Compound' duly packed in drums. After utilisation of the said raw material, the empty drums are sold by them. He submitted that duty has been confirmed by the Commissioner of Central Excise on the ground that during the process of emptying of the said drums, they have manufactured the said drums and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... emptying of drums of their contents does not amount to manufacture and that even after taking out the inputs, the drums remained drums and there was no scope to apply Rule 57F(4) in respect of clearances of such empty drums or to demand any duty thereon even if the assessee had taken Modvat credit of the duty paid on the contents received in such drums; (ii) 1998 (104) E.L.T. 807 (Supra Alloys Allied Products Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE) - In this matter, the assessee was receiving the inputs, namely, resins packed in drums/barrels. After the inputs were taken out, the empty containers were being sold by the assessee and these were removed without payment of any duty. It was contended by the assessee that emptying of drums did not result i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... le Tribunal as reported in 1998 (104) E.L.T. 478 on the ground of there being mistakes apparent from the record in the said Order reported in 1996 (83) E.L.T. 358. The said Appeal was, thereafter, ultimately allowed by the Hon'ble Tribunal by final Order No. 1821/98, dated 16-9-98, reported in 1999 (108) E.L.T. 383 by following the decision in the case of IOL Limited (Supra). In the circumstances, he said, the only decision relied upon by the Commissioner has since been itself recalled and the appeal has been, thereafter, finally decided in favour of the assessee. 3.3Apart from the foregoing, he also submitted that the present show cause notice issued on 19-3-96 for the period from March, 1991 to January, 1996 is barred by limitation of s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... emand of duty should not have deducted the amount of Central Excise Duty demanded by the said Order for determination of the assessable value of the containers in question and he should not have allowed the benefit of Notification No. 181/88-C.E., dated 13-5-88. He submitted that the first issue is clearly covered by the Tribunal's Larger Bench decision in the case of Srichakra Tyres Limited v. CCE reported in 1999 (108) E.L.T. 361 (T) = 1999 (32) RLT 1. He, further, submitted that the Commissioner has, in any circumstance and without prejudice to his foregoing submission that the containers were leviable to duty again, has rightly quantified the duty by applying the effective rate of duty in terms of Notification No. 181/88-C.E. instead of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... earance of the containers from the factory of the manufacturers. If the said containers are of durable nature and are repeatedly being used for filling up of the various products, they cannot be held liable to payment of duty at each and every stage in the hands of the assessees who receive the inputs duly filled in such containers. The reasoning of Shri Roy that the cost of these containers must have been added into the cost of compound filled in with, is not relatable to the issue. The appellants have taken the Modvat credit of duty paid on the 'Cable Filling Compound' by the manufacturer of the same. Whether the value of the containers has been added in the assessable value of the 'Cable Filling Compound' for the purposes of payment of d .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates