Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2001 (8) TMI 175

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 0,000/- was appropriated out of the paid amount of Rs. 13,29,073/- towards payment of duty and interest in terms of Condition - (ii) of Customs Notification No. 30/97, dated 1-4-1997 as amended under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner has also imposed a penalty equal to the amount of duty (i.e. Rs. 13,29,073/-) on the importers under Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. Ld. Counsel, Shri T. Ramesh submits that this guaicol was used in the manufacture of final product which has been cleared on payment of Central Excise duty. He further submits that there is no evidence against them that this quantity was not used in the manufacture of final product. He therefore submits that the goods as such are not liable for confi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s imported free of import duty under the DEEC Scheme and to fulfil the export obligation. The ld. DR has stated that they had not fulfilled the export obligation and the goods which were manufactured by them were diverted to the local market. It was on the intervention of the DRI that they have paid Custom duty on the imported raw material on the plea that they have not been able to use the raw materials. 5. While countering this argument of the ld. DR, ld. Counsel for the appellants stated that they had still one more year to fulfil the export obligation and they are not required to export 100% quantity as in the case of 100% Export Oriented Units. They are at liberty to sell certain quantity in the domestic market and since they had one .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... facts and circumstances, respectfully following the judgment of the Tribunal rendered in the case of CCE, Trichy v. Sundaram Industries Ltd., we reduce the penalty from Rs. 13,29,073/- to Rs. 4,50,000/- (Rupees four lakhs fifty thousand only) being about 30% of the duty amount. At this point ld. Counsel submits that since they have already deposited an amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- as per the direction of the CEGAT towards the penalty, the same may be adjusted and balance amount is directed to be deposited. Considered. The appellants is directed to deposit the balance amount of Rupees three lakh fifty thousand. The reduction of penalty has been done in the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case.
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements, Orde .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates