Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2003 (11) TMI 144

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ry correspondence between the appellants and the suppliers, whereby ongoing negotiation of price between buyer and seller is established and the genuineness of this correspondence has not even been doubted, the adoption of price as shown in the L/C is totally without the authority of law. It is more so for the reason that, the department in the impugned order, has not alleged even a single import at the price reflected in the said L/C, whereas there is a supplier s commitment to adjust the excess payment reflected in the L/C, against future shipments. Though the Commissioner s order does not spell out as to under which rule the value is determined, and the Ld. DR could not throw any light on this aspect, it appears to have been done under t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Taiwan, for US $ 55,570 as against the price of US $ 29,924.10 reflected in the invoice presented by the appellant along with the corresponding Bill of Entry. 2.2 In respect of B/E 110097, dated 22-10-96, as against the declared value of US $ 27,822.05, the authorities noticed that the said goods were insured by the supplier for US $ 56,589.01. Similar evidence of insurance value of US $ 52,982.18 against the declared value of US $ 24,219.25 was noticed. 2.3 It has also been alleged that the appellants furnished some documents claiming these to be the actual invoices and the prices figuring therein were tabulated against the prices declared in the corresponding B/Es. However, in the show cause notice that was issued, the basis of value en .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... overed L/C (For 8 B/Es). (ii) Based on the amount at which the supplier had insured the goods (For 2 B/Es). 3.1 The appellants made several submissions to refute the allegations and also produced the evidence of contemporary import from the same ICD, showing imports at prices comparable with the price declared by the appellants. But these grounds were not considered and the impugned order came to be passed against the appellants. 3.2 In the instant appeal, those very points are reiterated by the ld. Counsel for the appellants. Ld. DR pleads in support of the order, claiming that the appellants themselves have admitted to have indulged in undervaluation and have deposited part amounts towards duty voluntarily. 4.We have heard both sides. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... /Es. In the face of the contemporary correspondence between the appellants and the suppliers, whereby ongoing negotiation of price between buyer and seller is established and the genuineness of this correspondence has not even been doubted, the adoption of price as shown in the L/C is totally without the authority of law. It is more so for the reason that, the department in the impugned order, has not alleged even a single import at the price reflected in the said L/C, whereas there is a supplier's commitment to adjust the excess payment reflected in the L/C, against future shipments. 6.1The ground for adoption of price depression ratio to other consignments based on the price noticed in the specific consignment for which L/C has been reco .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... der Rule 8 cannot be done without exhausting the provisions contained in the earlier rules, especially Rules 5 and 6 dealing with valuation based on the value of identical goods (Rule 5) and similar goods (Rule 6). When the date for import of identical goods and similar goods was available in the ICD (even the appellants furnished such data) as well as other customs formation, taking recourse to valuation, as adopted in the impugned order is totally against the provisions contained in the Customs (Valuation) Rules, 1988. The impugned order, therefore, deserves to be set aside. 7.Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal. The appellants shall consequentially be entitled to the refund of the entire amount paid by them .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates