TMI Blog2005 (2) TMI 261X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Works for implementation of Tribunal's Final Order No. A/894/2000-NB(DB), dated 12-10-2000. 2. Shri Bipin Garg, learned Advocate, submitted that the Tribunal had set aside the Order-in-Appeal No. 70/CE/KNP.11/98 dated 27-2-1998 involving Modvat credit of Rs. 10,61,982.13 and penalty of Rs. 2 lakh; that during the pendency of the appeal, the applicants had debited the whole of the amount of cred ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ight to issue the show cause notice which is illegal and in disobeyance of the Final Order of the Tribunal. He, finally, submitted that the Tribunal, under Rule 41 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982, has the power to give such directions, as may be necessary or expedite to give effect or to prevent misuse of its process or to secure the ends of justice. 3. Opposing the prayer, Shri U. Raja Ra ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|