9911796707
TMI Blog2005 (3) TMI 369X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f duty of over Rs. 18 lakhs on the appellants, which is consequential to denial of SSI exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. (as amended). The lower authorities have found that the subject goods were cleared by the party under a brand name which belonged to a Sri Lankan company and, therefore, they were hit by the bar of para-4 of the Notification, whereunder the benefit of the notification w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f the notification. Ld. SDR has relied on the Supreme Court's judgment in Emkay Investments (P) Ltd. - 2004 (174) E.L.T. 298 (S.C.). 2. Ld. Counsel has, fairly, placed on record a copy of letter dt. 15-8-1997 of M/s. Ritzbury Lanka (Private) Ltd., wherein the appellant-company was given the right to manufacture and market products of the 'Ritzbury' range under their brand names. It appears from ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2003-04 is of order of Rs. 51 lakhs. Taking into account their financial hardships, we are not bent on directing them to make full deposit for the purpose of hearing the appeal. In a lenient approach, we direct them to pre-deposit an amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees Five lakhs only) within a period of 6 weeks. Report compliance on 18-4-2005. (Dictated and pronounced in open Court) - - TaxTMI ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
