Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1989 (5) TMI 96

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... uilding contending that it should be treated as plant in view of the Supreme Court's decision in the case of CIT v. Taj Mahal Hotel [1971] 82 ITR 44. The ITO stated that, by any stretch of imagination, the hotel building could not be treated as plant. Accordingly he rejected the assessee's claim for treatment of hotel building as plant. He allowed depreciation according to the rates permissible for hotel building. Aggrieved by the orders of the ITO the assessee carried the matter before the CIT(A). 3. Before the CIT(A), none was present on behalf of the assessee. Hence he decided the appeals on merits and allowed the assessee's appeals observing as under : "In CIT v. Taj Mahal Hotel [1971] 82 ITR 44, the Supreme Court referred to the me .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... el Srilekha (P.) Ltd. v. Third ITO [1983] 5 ITD 541. There is no definition of 'plant' in the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 43(3) is only an inclusive definition according to which plant includes ships, vehicles, books, scientific apparatus and surgical equipment used for the purpose of business of profession. Table of rates at which depreciation is admissible (Appendix-I, Part-I) as per rule 5 of Income-tax Rules, 1962 prescribed different rates of depreciation for buildings, furniture and fittings and machinery and plant. Thus it would be seen that the Income-tax Rules prescribed two different categories such as, building and plant for the purposes of depreciation. The CIT(A) referred to the decision of the Supreme Court in Taj Mahal Hote .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... upreme Court in the case of Taj Mahal Hotel at page 48 held that it cannot be denied that the business of a hotelier is carried on by adapting a building or premises in a suitable way to be used as a residential hotel where visitors come and stay and where there is arrangement for meals and other amenities are provided for their comfort and convenience. The CIT(A) is justified in holding the hotel building as the assessee's tool of trade and that there was no prohibition to treat a hotel building as a plant for the purpose of depreciation. In these facts and circumstances the orders of CIT(A) should be upheld. 6. We have considered the rival submissions and the case law cited before us. It is an admitted fact as can be seen from the asses .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t e.g. an ordinary commercial office. In the latter case, it may merely be a part of the building or setting in which the business is carried on and not the apparatus with which the business is carried on CIT v. Bank of India Ltd. [1979] 118 ITR 809 at page 819 (Bom.). The Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT v. Elecon Engg. Co. Ltd. [1974] 96 ITR 672 at page 698 held as under : "The word 'plant', in its ordinary meaning, is a word of wide import and in the context of section 32 it must be broadly construed. It includes any article or object, fixed or movable, live or dead, used by a businessman for carrying on his business. It is not necessarily confined to an apparatus which is used for mechanical operations or processes or is employed .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d to on apparatus which was used for mechanical operations or process or was employed in mechanical or industrial business. But in order to qualify as 'plant', the particular article had to have some degree or durability. The test to be applied was : Did the article fulfil the function of the plant in the assessee's trading activity ? Was it a tool of his trade with which he carried on his business ? If the answer was in the affirmative, it would be a 'plant'." In the case before us, the Hotel building is not merely used by the assessee as a space or place for carrying on the business. It constituted a tool of his trade with which he carried on the business of letting out the rooms to its customers. Respectfully following the decision of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates