9911796707
TMI Blog1983 (4) TMI 86X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... (Appeals) when the issue was carried before him. 2. The facts, in brief, pertaining to the issue are that the assessee Shri Shubh Karan Bansal who was an individual, had filed his return of income at a figure of Rs. 91,474 in which he had included the sum of Rs. 11,024.50 on account of share of profit earned by his minor son Shri Swapan Bansal from the firm M/s Babu Ram Sons. The said share ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n the hands of the assessee. On change of the ITO the succeeding ITO came to the conclusion that the income of Swapan Bansal should have been added for the period from 1st April, 1975 to 31st March, 1976 and therefore, he resorted to s. 147 (b) proceedings. In the course of reassessment proceedings he clubbed up the entire sum. 3. When the issue was carried before the CIT (A) he annulled the re ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rival submissions and looking to the facts we are unable to interfere in the order of the CIT (A). We had an occasion to deal with identical issue of the case of Smt. Urmila Rani with the only difference that in that case it was at the instance of audit that s. 147 (b) proceeding were initiated. The instant case is even on a stronger footing so far as the contentions and the assessee's claim is co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
