Clandestine removal - allegation cannot be merely on the basis ...

Court Rules: Allegations in Excise Cases Require Concrete Evidence, Not Just Presumptions or Suspicions. Decision Supports Assessee's Position.

June 18, 2013

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Clandestine removal - allegation cannot be merely on the basis of presumptions and assumptions. Suspicion however grave cannot replace the proof - decided in favor of assessee by majority decision - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Clandestine removal - allegation cannot be merely on the basis ...

Court Rules: Allegations in Excise Cases Require Concrete Evidence, Not Just Presumptions or Suspicions. Decision Supports Assessee's Position.

June 18, 2013

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Dishonour of cheque case - petitioner-accused failed to deposit the amount despite existence of legally enforceable debt/liability. No evidence led to rebut presumption...

The trial court erroneously invoked the presumption u/s 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, without considering the contradictions in the evidence of the...

Dishonour of Cheque - The High Court observed that, the presumption under Section 139 of the N.I. Act is a presumption of law, as distinguished from the presumption of...

Advance Authorisation Scheme - Non-fulfilment of Export Obligation - fraudulent activities - allegation of collusion with the Customs officials - The CESTAT examined the...

Dishonor of cheque - presumption that cheque was issued in discharge of legal liability, burden on accused to prove contrary. Supreme Court observations: While deciding...

Dishonor of cheque - maintainability of appeal - correctness of acquittal of accused - Allegation is that the complainant has misused the signed cheque which was kept in...

Presumption u/ss 118(a) and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not properly applied by the Trial Court. When presumption u/s 139 is raised, the onus shifts to the...

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a case involving allegations of fraudulent claim of Input Tax Credit (ITC) and furnishing fake GST certificate for...

Dishonor of Cheque - Corroborative piece of evidence is not a rule of law, but it is a rule of prudence and presumption under Section 139 of the Act, 1881 is rule of law...

Seizure of tobacco and loss of the same due to file - Liability of central excise department - Whether the Trial Court has committed error of facts and law in passing...

The case pertains to an addition made u/s 69 for unexplained investment in agricultural land at Ratlam. The issue revolved around whether the addition was based on...

Seeking grant of Regular Bail - Money Laundering - proceeds of crime - predicate offence - subsidy fraud in IFFCO by opening Kisan International Trading - The Delhi High...

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

Bogus sundry creditors - Whether CIT(A) had clearly violated the provisions of Rule 46A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, while admitting additional evidence? - The High...

Dishonour of cheque case instituted within 30 days from legal notice date satisfies condition precedent for cognizance u/s 138 and 142(b) of NI Act. Complaint within...

Quick Updates: