When the disciplinary proceedings against the officers under CCS ...

Disciplinary Actions Dropped; Penalties Nullified for Officers Under CCS (CCA) Rules Proceedings.

July 16, 2013

Case Laws Customs AT

When the disciplinary proceedings against the officers under CCS (CCA) Rules have been dropped, the imposition of penalty against them based on the same charges would also not survive - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

When the disciplinary proceedings against the officers under CCS ...

Disciplinary Actions Dropped; Penalties Nullified for Officers Under CCS (CCA) Rules Proceedings.

July 16, 2013

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Levy of GST on the penalty levied in the disciplinary proceedings - the penalty imposed, under Rule 7(b) (xiv) of the Code in a disciplinary proceedings initiated...

The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

Levy of penalty - Applicability of the substituted rule for imposition of penalty - The Supreme Court sided with the appellant, holding that the substituted rule from...

The High Court held that once a proper officer initiates proceedings on a subject matter under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) or the Haryana...

The court held that Section 6(2)(b) of the Act treats the empowered officers under the SGST/UGST Act at the central level to be at par and does not prescribe for...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

Disciplinary proceedings - allegation of misconduct - Proceedings against ex-Superintendent of Central Excise - Reliance on confessional statements made by accused...

Misconduct - Disciplinary Action against the erstwhile Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise - DEPB Scheme - Imposing penalty of withholding of 30% of monthly...

Disciplinary proceedings against the customs officer (Inspector) - delay in the proceedings - decided in favor of officer - HC

Demand of excise duty and penalty – recovery of dues from the auction purchaser unit in terms of Rule 230(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 - recovery proceedings dropped - HC

Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

Levy of penalty - taking CENVAT Credit irregularly - it is the contention of the Assessee that there is some element of discretion available in the adjudicating officer...

Imposition of penalty u/s 209A of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules 1944 in remand proceedings - The order of dropping penalty was never challenged in any subsequent...

The High Court held that the proceedings initiated u/s 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 were vitiated as the Proper Officer had previously dropped the proceedings u/s 61(2)...

Securities Contracts (Regulation) (Procedure for Holding Inquiry and Imposing Penalties by Adjudicating Officer) (Amendment) Rules, 2019

Quick Updates: