Penalty u/s 22(2) of the TNGST - Having regard to the patent ...

High Court Nullifies Tribunal's Order on Penalty Due to Jurisdictional Error under TNGST Act Section 22(2.

July 26, 2013

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

Penalty u/s 22(2) of the TNGST - Having regard to the patent illegality on account of absence of jurisdiction as per the proviso as it stood during the relevant assessment year - Order of Tribunal set aside - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 22(2) of the TNGST - Having regard to the patent ...

High Court Nullifies Tribunal's Order on Penalty Due to Jurisdictional Error under TNGST Act Section 22(2.

July 26, 2013

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

You may also like:

Rectification of certain errors apparent on face of order denied in AAR ruling. AR contended AAR should have ruled on all queries. Held: No error apparent on record...

ITAT recalled its earlier order due to discovery of inadvertent errors, specifically the reliance on non-existing case laws identified during suo-moto review. Exercising...

Notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer/Deputy Commissioner is invalid and cannot be cured. The assessment order framed u/s 143(3) based on...

Recovery of Tax - Attachment and auction of property - Right of buyer of property in Auction - the dues as claimed by the respondent no.2, being a charge on the...

Validity of assessment order - Transfer of case from jurisdiction - Notice u/s 143(2) was issued by the ITO Ward-2, Malegaon, Nasik, Maharashtra whereas Assessment order...

Validity of assessment - Jurisdiction - An irregularity in the assessment order may be rectified by remitting back the matter to the assessment. In the case on hand it...

Disallowance on account of loss on error trade - due to human error in punching the wrong scrip code, or punching of wrong quantity or in punching buy order in place of...

Assessment framed without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(2) by jurisdictional officer. Assessee filed return with Range-1(1), notice u/s 143(2) issued by ITO,...

Del HC held assessment order issued in name of Cairn India Limited after its amalgamation with Vedanta Limited was fundamentally void and not rectifiable under s.154 or...

Validity of provisional assessment order - The procedures to be followed in the department for assessment are well settled. Thus, the authorities competent are not...

Jurisdiction of AO - The procedures to be followed in the department for assessment are well settled. Thus, the authorities competent are not expected to commit such...

The jurisdictional Assessing Officer (AO) had suo moto transferred the assessment to Income Tax Officer (ITO), Ward 2(2) Noida. The appellant contended that the...

Section 142(1) notice issued by non-jurisdictional officer held valid. Plain reading of Section 143(2) indicates either Assessing Officer or prescribed income-tax...

Validity of notice u/s 143(2) - Assuming wrong jurisdiction by issuing notice u/s 143 (2) by a non-jurisdictional AO and then framing the assessment by jurisdictional AO...

Section 143(2) is a mandatory requirement, and failure to comply with it renders the reassessment proceedings invalid. The High Court has consistently held that Section...

Quick Updates: