Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Non-compliance with a notice issued u/s ...

Tribunal Overturns Penalty for Non-Compliance, Citing Favorable Precedent and High Court's Quashing of Assessment Order.

May 7, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) - The Tribunal noted that in a previous round of proceedings, a penalty under section 271(1)(b) of the Act had been deleted by the Tribunal, indicating a precedent in favor of the appellant. Considering the circumstances, including the quashing of the assessment order by the High Court in the second round of proceedings, the Tribunal found that the penalty imposed in connection with those proceedings was untenable.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Non-compliance with a notice issued u/s ...

Tribunal Overturns Penalty for Non-Compliance, Citing Favorable Precedent and High Court's Quashing of Assessment Order.

May 7, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Revocation of Customs Broker License - Overvaluation and misdeclaration with intent to claim drawback under section 75 of Customs Act, 1962 - The tribunal acknowledged...

The case involves penalty imposition u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with statutory notices issued u/ss 143(2) and 142(1). Assessee explained non-compliance due to a...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - An order in the name of dead person - The Appellate Tribunal acknowledged that the penalty order was indeed issued in the name of a deceased...

Penalty levied u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with documentary evidence requirements was challenged by the assessee, citing COVID-19 restrictions as a reasonable...

Penalty proceedings u/s 270A - Applicable rate of penalty - The Appellate Tribunal noted that while the penalty notice cited under-reporting of income, the AO imposed...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) concerning the correct classification of income. The Assessing Officer treated the income as 'income...

Oppression and Mismanagement - The Appellate Tribunal highlighted the absence of reasoning in the impugned order, especially regarding the direction for an independent...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving penalty u/s 271(1)(C) for non-filing of income tax return despite taxable income and interest income. Assessee...

Penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS was challenged. ITAT held that where assessee received sale consideration for immovable property in cash exceeding Rs....

The Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of penalty proceedings u/s 270A due to the failure to specify relevant clauses. It was held that the penalty proceedings...

Proceedings against importer when the sole proprietor of M/s Ganpati Enterprises had expired - mis -declaration and short payment of duty - imposition of penalty on...

Levy of penalty for delay in Submission of Documents - finalization of the provisional assessments - The Tribunal acknowledged the delay in document submission but noted...

The ITAT Mumbai, in a case involving penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for estimation of income on bogus purchases, held that when additions are based on estimation, no penalty can...

The Appellate Tribunal considered two issues: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) and u/s 270A. For the first, the Tribunal found the penalty notice defective as it did not specify...

Quick Updates: