Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2013 Year 2013 This

Assessable Value of Goods – inclusion of fee payable by the ...


Court Sets Aside Demand Due to Lack of Evidence on Fee Inclusion for Sole Distribution Rights u/r 10(1)(d.

October 1, 2013

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Assessable Value of Goods – inclusion of fee payable by the appellants for the Sole Distribution Rights - the department could not show any evidence that the aforesaid fee was liable to be loaded in terms of Rule 10(1)(d) - demand set aside - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

  2. Clandestine removal demand based on electricity consumption not sustainable as mere electricity consumption cannot be the sole basis for determining duty liability....

  3. Confiscation of imported liquor cases, imposition of penalties, and demand of duty. The Tribunal held that there was no intentional misdeclaration or fraudulent intent...

  4. CIRP - Liability to pay transfer fee of 10% of the prevailing market value of the Kharagpur land - The court determines the validity of notices issued by the respondents...

  5. The CESTAT disposed of the appeal with the following key holdings: Undervaluation relating to stock transfer to their own unit and sale to sister unit was held not...

  6. Customs broker's license revocation order set aside due to lack of evidence for alleged violations. Key findings: no proof of misdeclaration or undervaluation to...

  7. Appellant challenged inclusion of royalty and cost of advertisement incurred in India in assessable value of imported goods u/rs 10(1)(c) and 10(1)(e) of Customs...

  8. Failure to file Form 10/10B before due date prescribed u/s 139(1) cannot be fatal to deny exemption u/s 11(2), especially when Form 10/10B was available on record when...

  9. Valuation of imported goods - inclusion of licence fee in the invoice value - It can be seen that Rule 10 (1) (c) uses the words ‘as a condition of sale’. The...

  10. CESTAT set aside multiple duty demands totaling over Rs. 2.3 crores against appellant manufacturer of LABSA. Primary allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal...

  11. The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving contravention of section 9(1)(f)(i) of FERA 1973. The appellant argued lack of material and violation of natural...

  12. The High Court set aside an assessment order due to lack of reasonable opportunity for the petitioner to contest the tax demand on merits. The show cause notice and...

  13. The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders where the petitioner lacked a reasonable opportunity to contest tax demands due to discrepancies in returns....

  14. Penalty imposed by the Settlement Commission u/s 271(1)(c) - The petitioner argued against the penalty, citing lack of mens rea and the absence of evidence showing...

  15. The case involved revocation of a Customs Broker (CB) license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposition due to misuse of Transfer of Residence (TR)...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates