The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving contravention ...

Appellant denied allegations under FERA 1973, requested cross-examination not granted. Lack of evidence against appellant, order set aside.

June 14, 2024

Case Laws FEMA AT

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving contravention of section 9(1)(f)(i) of FERA 1973. The appellant argued lack of material and violation of natural justice, requesting cross-examination of Sudhir Kapadia. The order lacked evidence linking the appellant to the alleged contravention. Sudhir Kapadia's statement was the sole basis, but he retracted it. The appellant was denied the opportunity to cross-examine him. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence against the appellant and set aside the order, highlighting the need for proper evidence and fair procedure.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving contravention ...

Appellant denied allegations under FERA 1973, requested cross-examination not granted. Lack of evidence against appellant, order set aside.

June 14, 2024

Case Laws FEMA AT

You may also like:

Principles of natural justice - request for cross examination of panch-witnesses and of departmental officers has been rejected - the allegations of Show Cause Notice...

The AT rejected appellant's contention that denial of cross-examination of departmental officers violated natural justice principles. The tribunal distinguished between...

The summary focuses on the rejection of cross-examination of DRI officers and a co-noticee by the competent authority. The main objective of cross-examination is to...

Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed by...

The AT dismissed the appeals challenging denial of cross-examination requests for officers who recorded statements under the Customs Act and FERA. The tribunal...

Violation of principles of natural justice - opportunity for cross-examination. Evidentiary value of statements recorded u/s 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be...

Validity of reassessment order u/s 147 - Denial of Cross-Examination Opportunity - Reliance of statement of third party - The High Court noted that the petitioner did...

This case pertains to penalties imposed for alleged violation of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA), 1973. The respondent claimed the appellant transferred...

Principles of Natural Justice - Levy of Penalty - It is no doubt true that there is no right of cross-examination if sufficient corroborative evidence exists, but in the...

HC addressed a challenge regarding natural justice principles in adjudication proceedings. Petitioners sought cross-examination rights of DRI officers following Show...

The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice principles due to the rejection of the petitioner's request for cross-examination in a matter...

The Appellate Tribunal found the Appellant Company guilty of contravening u/s 9(1)(a) of FERA 1973 by making payments to a person outside India without RBI permission....

Clandestine removal demand based on electrical consumption was challenged. Average electricity consumption for certain periods was calculated. Cross-examination of...

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside the impugned order and remanded the cases back to the adjudicating authority. The appellants...

This case pertains to an alleged offense under FEMA involving bogus purported exports with inflated invoices to obtain export benefits, where the goods never reached the...

Quick Updates: