Penalty on CHA - There was no deliberate attempt on the part of ...

Case Laws Customs

October 1, 2013

Penalty on CHA - There was no deliberate attempt on the part of the appellant in violating the law; therefore penalty against the appellant herein is much on the higher side, especially considering the fact that the appellant was only a small time CHA - penalty reduced - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty on CHA - There was no deliberate attempt on the part of ...

Case Laws Customs

October 1, 2013

You may also like:

Levy of penalty on CHA u/s 114(i) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - acts of omission and commission in relation to the attempted illegal export of Red Sanders - So,...

Misclassification and Wrongful Claim of MEIS Benefits - Exports of quilts containing cotton/polyester - Levy of penalties - The CESTAT found the appellant guilty of...

Penalty levied u/s 105(a) of the Securities Transaction Tax (STT) (Finance (no.2) Act, 2004)- Though, as observed by the Supreme Court, the expression ‘penalty’ is a...

Levy of penalty on CHA u/s 114 (iii) and Section 114AA respectively of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation of abatement - fraudulent export to claim duty drawback - The...

Levy of penalty for violation of section 129 and Rule 138 - Failure to update the E-way bill on change of vehicle after breakdown - The imposition of penalties for mere...

Imposition of penalties on CHA - mis-declaration of vessel - the inclusion of ‘supply vessel’ in the description is equally ambiguous in deciding upon the classification....

Penalty proceedings u/s 270A - Applicable rate of penalty - The Appellate Tribunal noted that while the penalty notice cited under-reporting of income, the AO imposed...

Levy of Penalty on appellant –CHA u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act - export of prohibited goods or not - appellant is negligent in performing their duty as a CHA - as the...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Levy of penalty u/s 54(1)(2) of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008 - men-rea - The Court concluded that mens rea is indeed an essential prerequisite for imposing a penalty under...

Maintainability appeal before High Court - Substantial Question of Law - Imposition of penalty u/s 114AA of Customs Broker / CHA - CESTAT found that the case of the...

The key points are: misdeclaration of goods by the importer cannot render the Customs House Agent (CHA) vicariously liable for penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962....

Penalty on CHA - There was a serious lapse on part of the CHA in verifying the KYC before taking up the Custom clearance of consignment of rough diamond - levy of...

Imposition of penalty on CHA - When the Department itself, only on the basis of the chemical analysis, was able to ascertain that the goods attempted to be exported was...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Whether 'mens rea' or deliberate attempt is not essential for levy of penalty - A mere making of the claim, which is not sustainable in law, by...

Quick Updates: