The original authority had dispatched only one order in original ...

Appellant's single appeal deemed valid as original authority sent one order instead of four separate ones.

October 14, 2013

Case Laws Central Excise AT

The original authority had dispatched only one order in original and not the four orders in original to the appellants - one appeal filed by the appellant before Commissioner (Appeals) is maintainable and there was no need for the appellant to file four separate appeals against one order in original - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

The original authority had dispatched only one order in original ...

Appellant's single appeal deemed valid as original authority sent one order instead of four separate ones.

October 14, 2013

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Number of appeals - Four Show Cause Notices - One order in original - there was no need for the appellant to file four separate appeals against one order in original. - AT

Appellant filed refund claim which was initially rejected by original authority on grounds of ineligibility for exemption notification. Commissioner (Appeals) remanded...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment after four years and the addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act. It held that the original assessment was...

Dishonour of Cheque - proceedings initiated by the appellant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Validity of handwritten note (Notice) sent by...

The case pertains to the confiscation of foreign marked gold bars by customs authorities. The appellant claimed the gold was procured from a legitimate source and was...

Approval of Resolution Plan - voting share was not sufficient enough to get any plan approved - There are only two option available as on date, first to direct the...

The case involved a dispute over the classification of services provided under turnkey contracts as either Consulting Engineering Services or Works Contract Services....

The HC held that the four-year limitation period u/s 64 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, pertains to the initiation of revisional proceedings by the...

Clandestine manufacture and recovery of Central Excise Duty along with interest and penalty - suppression of facts and misrepresentation alleged against petitioner -...

Appellants engaged in manufacturing dutiable goods and providing exempted trading services failed to maintain separate accounts for input services utilized in both...

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

The appellant, a large account reseller authorized by Microsoft, received IT services from Microsoft for which payments were made. The department alleged that Microsoft...

Refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit - rejection of refund on the ground that credit was transferred to GST regime through TRAN-1 - it is not a case that the appellant has...

Condonation of delay in filing of the appeal by the appellants before the Commissioner (Appeal) - The appellants argued that there were genuine and reasonable causes for...

Refund of service tax - Appellant has one unit in SEZ and on in DTA - There is no dispute that the appellant’s service provider is located in Kolkata which is a DTA unit...

Quick Updates: