Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2013 Year 2013 This

Tribunal was justified in holding that no separate penalties ...


Tribunal Rules Against Additional Penalties for Partners Beyond Firm's Penalty in Partnership Case.

November 13, 2013

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Tribunal was justified in holding that no separate penalties were warranted on the partners in addition to the penalty on the partnership firm - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Imposition of penalty on partners - penalty on partner is not imposable when the firm is penalised under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.

  2. Imposition of personal penalty on the Partner of the Firm in terms of Section 78A of the Finance Act, 1994 - The case involved the imposition of a personal penalty on...

  3. Penalty u/r 26 of CER - Clandestine removal - Once the penalty was imposed on a partnership firm, no separate penalty should be imposed on the partners separately for...

  4. Penalty u/s 112 - since penalty has been imposed on partnership firm under Section 112 (a), separate penalty on its partner would not be justified - AT

  5. Imposition of penalty - If any liability arises against the partnership firm i.e. shifted on partners of partnership firm in the sharing ratio of the partners,...

  6. CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving penalty u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on a co-noticee who is a Partner in a Customs Broker firm for...

  7. Imposition of penalties on partners of manufacturing firm u/r 26 of CER - non-payment of Central Excise duty by the partnership firm, M/s Allied Electricals - It is not...

  8. Levy of simultaneous penalties on both the Partner and Partnership firm in adjudication proceedings under the Customs Act. - Penalty for abeting - Simultaneous...

  9. Penalty levied u/s 271D - capital contributed by the partner in the partnership firm does not tantamount to loan or deposit within the meaning of section 269SS - No penalty - AT

  10. Imposition of Simultaneous Penalties - Whether CESTAT erred in imposing simultaneous penalties on both the Partner and Partnership firm – Matter referred to larger bench - HC

  11. Demand of service tax on partners services to partnership firm - separate identity - mutuality of services - there cannot be a service provider – service recipient...

  12. In deposit of trading receipts of the firm in the bank account of the partner, the assessee has not violated any of the provisions of the Income Tax Act, even if it may...

  13. Evasion of duty - Underbilling - penalty on the partner as well as the partnership Firm can be simultaneously imposed and of course, imposition of penalty both on the...

  14. Characterization of income - consideration received by the partner of a firm upon retirement from the firm - retirement benefit - any money received by the partner upon...

  15. Whether the Appellate Tribunal was justified in sustaining the penalty on the husband of the dormant partner, while sustaining the penalty on the Partnership Firm? -...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates