Register Daily Newsletters My Bookmarks My Queries (D. Forum) My Replies (D. Forum) My Articles My Inbox (PM) Feedback/ Suggestions
Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

   For Sales / Support:
WhatsApp WhatsApp 9911796707
Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals Articles News D. Forum Highlights Notes
Income Tax Bill, 2025     TaxTMI    TMI - e-Newsletter     TaxTMI    Government Securities Trading Rules Modified Under...     TaxTMI    Finance Ministry Revises AIDC Rates: Bourbon...     TaxTMI    Partnership Firm Wins Appeal Delay Condonation...     TaxTMI    Tax Department Must Share Documents Requested by...     TaxTMI    Input Tax Credit Denied: Taxpayers Failed to Prove...     TaxTMI    Input Tax Credit Utilization From Different GST...     TaxTMI    DGFT Makes Electronic Certificates of Origin...     TaxTMI    Central Government Sets Phased Implementation Dates...     TaxTMI    RBI Revises Payment Rules Between ACU Member...     TaxTMI    Stock Exchanges Must Take Full Responsibility for...     TaxTMI    SEBI Makes Intermediaries Fully Liable for AI...     TaxTMI    New Income Tax Bill Proposes Single Tax Year...     TaxTMI    Assessment Order Under Section 73 of GST Act...     TaxTMI    Revenue Appeals Below Rs. 2 Crores Must Be...     TaxTMI    Legal Heirs Must Pay Compensation in Cheque Bounce...     TaxTMI    Latest Case-Laws     TaxTMI    Latest Notifications + Circulars     TaxTMI    GST Council Decisions     TaxTMI       Right Stop
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2013 Year 2013 This

Penalty under Rule 26(1) of Central excise rules 2002 - Bogus ...


Appellant Penalized for Issuing Fake Cenvatable Invoices u/r 26(1) of Central Excise Rules 2002.

November 20, 2013

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Penalty under Rule 26(1) of Central excise rules 2002 - Bogus Cenvatable invoices issued - the appellant was liable to pay penalty - AT

View Source

 

← Previous Next →

 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty - Bogus invoice issued without selling the goods – penalty would be attracted under Rule 25 (1) (d) as well as Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - AT

  2. Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was Director during relevant period - Since the demand of the duty has already been settled under SVLDRS...

  3. Levy of penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent passing of cenvat Credit - it is clearly established that the appellant has facilitated by only issuing...

  4. Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

  5. Revocation of registration under Central Excise - Revocation of registration, not provided for in Central Excise Rules, 2002 and only in exercise of power of Central...

  6. Penalty on directors - Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules - Rule 26 is prima facie in excess of the Rule making power conferred under the Central Excise Act, 1944 - HC

  7. The appellant was issued penalty u/r 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002, alleging that second stage dealers based in Jaipur were issuing cenvatable invoices to the main...

  8. Penalty u/r 26(1) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - charge of abating the evasion of duty by the Main Party - The appellant argued that since the main party's case of duty...

  9. Imposition of penalty u/r 26(2) of CER, 2002 - CENVAT Credit - Wrong availment of credit and reversal thereof on being pointed out before the issue of SCN - maximum...

  10. Levy of penalty in the absence of confiscation - penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 even in case where there is no proposal for confiscation can be...

  11. Levy of penalty u/s 25(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - evasion of duty - The imposition of penalty on both the appellants is un-called for - since Appellant No.1,...

  12. Clandestine removal of excisable goods - Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 imposed on Managing Director. Appellant challenged Order upholding penalty without...

  13. CENVAT Credit - fake invoices - The person is a company and having no knowledge or benefit arriving out of the activity - the penalty is not imposable on a juristic...

  14. Levy of penalty under Rule 25 of CER, 2002 – issuing invoices without accompanying the goods - appellant not dealt with the excisable goods at all. The penalties on the...

  15. Method of Valuation - prototype vehicles - goods cleared from the factory on payment of duty under self invoice on the comparable value of the similar vehicle applying...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates

What's New:
    Latest Case Laws
What's New:
    Latest Notifications
What's New:
    Latest Circulars
F: Participant Questions Legality of Single SCN for Two Years Under Secti...
F: Business Challenges ITC Reversal Due to Supplier's GST Non-Payment, Ci...
F: GST Registration Required for Reverse Charge on Goods Transport Servic...
F: Debate on GST's Applicability to Stamp Duty: Exemption Under SI. No 47...
H: GST Council Clarifies Rates: 5% on Pepper, Tax-Free Raisins, Different...
H: Exim Bank's $120M Credit Line to GO-VNM for High-Speed Guard Boats und...
H: Export-Import Bank's $180M Credit Line for Offshore Patrol Vessels Mus...
H: Gold Bullion Import Quota: New Rules for TRQ Allocation Require Certif...
H: DGFT Sets Import Quotas: 0.8 MT Calcined 1.9 MT Raw Petroleum Coke for...
H: Government Securities Trading Rules Modified Under Section 16 to Contr...
H: Finance Ministry Revises AIDC Rates: Bourbon Whiskey at 50%, Other Alc...
H: Private Companies Get Extended Deadline Until June 30, 2025 For Securi...
A: Section 10AA: Tax Exemptions for Companies in SEZs Boost Export Income...
A: Supreme Court orders insurance company to settle truck fire claim, val...
A: Court Quashes Penalty for Wrong Tax Head Credit Allocation; Electronic...
A: Uttar Pradesh Launches E-HRMS Portal for State Employees: Streamlined ...
A: Retrospective GST Cancellations Risk Halting Business Operations; Cour...
A: Filing Complaints on Misleading Food Labels: Understanding the Process...
A: Telangana High Court Validates Extension of Limitation Period for Show...
A: Global Shift to Ban Harmful Food Additives: Health, Safety, and Enviro...
A: E-commerce operators must pay GST liabilities via cash ledger under Se...
A: Indian Customs Cuts Port Dwell Time with Direct Port Delivery, Faceles...
F: Debate on Time-Barred Appeals Post FORM GST APL-02 Issuance Under Sect...
H: Small Retailer Gets Final Chance to Restore GST Registration by Filing...
H: GST Refund Claim Rejection Invalid: Authority Must Give Reasoned Order...
H: Tax Reassessment Under Section 147 Invalid When No Material Facts Were...
H: Tax Authorities Must Re-examine Trading Results and Form 26AS Discrepa...
H: Taxpayer's Section 10(26AAA) Sikkimese Exemption Claim Remanded for Fr...
H: Property Transaction Additions Under Section 69A Deleted Due to Bankin...
H: Assessment Order Under Section 56(1)(vii) For Rs. 139.67 Crores Quashe...