Excess goods not clandestine removal – non accountal of the ...

Excess Goods Without Intent to Conceal Do Not Trigger Penalties Due to Lack of Required Mens Rea.

December 20, 2013

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Excess goods not clandestine removal – non accountal of the goods, which are not meant for clandestine removal would not attract penal provisions, inasmuch as mens rea for imposition of penalty is required - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Excess goods not clandestine removal – non accountal of the ...

Excess Goods Without Intent to Conceal Do Not Trigger Penalties Due to Lack of Required Mens Rea.

December 20, 2013

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

Levy of penalty - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - existence of mens rea or not The High Court referenced a specific case and highlighted that the issue of...

Penalty u/s 114(i) on CHA - Export of "Carbon Black" - Obligation of CHA for the unauthorized loading of the container without LEO (Let Export Order) - The Tribunal...

Penalty imposed by the Settlement Commission u/s 271(1)(c) - The petitioner argued against the penalty, citing lack of mens rea and the absence of evidence showing...

Detention of goods on onward journey - detention on ground goods dispatched to different place than mentioned in documents - levy of penalty u/s 129 of UPGST Act -...

If there is no mens rea, no mandatory penalty u/s 11AC - SC

Levy of penalty - existence of mens rea or not - The appellant's argument that they were unaware of the need for authorization and had exported similar goods for years...

Levy of penalty - mens rea in evasion of tax - It is well settled that by merely using the expression “mens rea”, it would not amount to concluding that there was a...

Levy of penalty u/s 54(1)(2) of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008 - men-rea - The Court concluded that mens rea is indeed an essential prerequisite for imposing a penalty under...

Levy of penalty - smuggling of Gold - baggage rules - The case involved the petitioner's challenge against the imposition of a penalty under Sections 112(a) and 112(b)...

Levy of penalty - goods were unloaded at a place that was not registered in the registration certificate - unloading goods at a location not specified in the e-way bill...

Levy of penalty - confiscation of goods - The High court held that the goods imported without a valid Wireless Planning & Coordination (WPC) license, which turned out to...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Classification of imported goods - LC PUFA Mix Oil with Sofinol (edible grade) - whether to be classified under CTH 15079010 or CTH 15179090 - importer misclassified...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

Quick Updates: