Valuation of property - The difference in the valuation which ...

Court Rules Revenue's Valuation Discrepancy Not Unexplained Investment; Rejects Rs. 2,35,933/- Claim Based on DVO Report.

January 11, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Valuation of property - The difference in the valuation which has been claimed by the revenue as per the valuation report of the DVO amounting to Rs. 2,35,933/- on estimate basis cannot be said to be unexplained investment - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Valuation of property - The difference in the valuation which ...

Court Rules Revenue's Valuation Discrepancy Not Unexplained Investment; Rejects Rs. 2,35,933/- Claim Based on DVO Report.

January 11, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Enhancement made by the Ld. CIT(A) u/s 251(1) r.w.s. 56(2) (viib) - AO substituted fair market value determined by the assessee through his own valuation - Assessees...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer's invocation of Section 56(2)(viib) read with Rule 11UA for determining the fair market value of unquoted...

Rejection of declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12, re-determination of value under Valuation Rules 4-9. Commissioner followed Rule 9, adopted actual values...

In the case, ITAT decided on two main issues: 1. Addition on account of Gold and Silver Jewellery u/s 69A: Assessee disclosed Rs. 70,00,000 as unexplained investment...

HC quashed orders rejecting assessee's request for revision u/s 264. Differential value between sale deed and stamp duty valuation exceeded Rs. 50,000, invoking Section...

Additions u/s 56(2)(viib) - it is not denied that the assessee adopted clause (b) of Rule 11UA(2) of the Rules and accordingly obtained a Valuation Report from a...

Validity of assessment order - Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and 11: The discrepancies include issues such as non-GST supplies, alleged mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1...

The CESTAT disposed of the appeal with the following key holdings: Undervaluation relating to stock transfer to their own unit and sale to sister unit was held not...

Levy of penalty - taking CENVAT Credit irregularly - it is the contention of the Assessee that there is some element of discretion available in the adjudicating officer...

Place of provision of service - Export of services or not - POPOS Rules - while relying on Rule 2(i)(b)(ii) the revenue ignores the existence of Rule 2(i)(b)(i) while...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the addition of Rs. 51.20 lacs as unexplained investment u/ss 69 or 56(2)(x)/6(2)(vii) was unjustified as there was no evidence of...

Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D - the AO has not computed any disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(i) and Rule 8D(2)(ii) of the Rules and only under Rule 8D(2)(iii) of...

Addition u/s 56(2)(viib) - application of Rule 11UA - FMV of redeemable preference shares - sub-Rule (2) of Rule 11UA deals valuation in respect of unquoted equity...

Valuation of imported goods - Admittedly, it is evident on the face of the record that deductive value was available before the Court below which have not been rejected...

Assessee issued shares at fair market value computed as per Rule 11UA(2), but Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) rejected valuation without justification. Statute...

Quick Updates: