Copyright infringement - On piercing the Corporate veil, it was ...

Court Pierces Corporate Veil: Defendant No.1 Used to Evade Orders by Defendant No.2 in Copyright Infringement Case.

January 23, 2014

Case Laws Companies Law HC

Copyright infringement - On piercing the Corporate veil, it was observed that, the defendant No.1 company has been floated by defendant No.2 to circumvent the orders passed by the Court - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Copyright infringement - On piercing the Corporate veil, it was ...

Court Pierces Corporate Veil: Defendant No.1 Used to Evade Orders by Defendant No.2 in Copyright Infringement Case.

January 23, 2014

Case Laws Companies Law HC

You may also like:

Forward trade in commodities - Trading Irregularities - Piercing of corporate veil - Issuing show cause notice to the second respondent and not to the first respondent -...

Piercing the corporate veil - Application of section 2(22)(e) and 56(2)(vi) - only the equity shares of M/s. SKM Egg Products Export (India) Ltd., were transferred and...

Suit decreed partially for recovery, doctrine of lis pendens applied. Agreement dated 17.08.1990 not found fraudulent or result of collusion between plaintiff and...

CIRP proceedings - piercing of Corporate Veil - seeking invoking the Bank Guarantee furnished by the parent company - the instant application is a fit case for piercing...

Doctrine of piercing the corporate veil - In proceedings for declaration of Wilful Defaulter, the corporate veil has to be lifted in order to examine the role of the...

Validity of assessment order - Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and 11: The discrepancies include issues such as non-GST supplies, alleged mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1...

Dishonor of Cheque - Plaint was filed that Cheque was issued as security and misused by the defendant - Jurisdiction of Revisional Court in rejecting the plaint - In the...

Dishonour of cheque - vicarious liability - liability of group companies - liability common Directors of the group, namely, Right Choice Group of Companies - Lifting of...

The High Court dismissed the application challenging the freezing orders issued by the Enforcement Directorate u/s 17 and Section 17(1-A) of the Prevention of Money...

Scope of the DTVSV scheme - As under the DTVSV Act, 2020 each appeal, writ petition or SLP is treated as a separate dispute which is evident from Section 2(1)(j) read...

Failure to file Form 10/10B before due date prescribed u/s 139(1) cannot be fatal to deny exemption u/s 11(2), especially when Form 10/10B was available on record when...

CENVAT Credit - input - fuel - the exception to sub-rule (1) which is contained in sub-rule (2) itself contains an exception, namely, inputs intended to be used as fuel....

Assessment framed without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(2) by jurisdictional officer. Assessee filed return with Range-1(1), notice u/s 143(2) issued by ITO,...

The High Court dismissed the application filed by the plaintiffs seeking an order to require the defendants to secure an amount of Rs. 1,14,88,833/- until the disposal...

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

Quick Updates: