Refund - negative price variation - assessee issued the credit ...

Refund Claim Approved: No Unjust Enrichment as Duty Incidence Not Passed to Buyers in Credit Note Case.

February 1, 2014

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Refund - negative price variation - assessee issued the credit notes to their customers - duty incidence does not stand passed on to the buyers, and as such are not hit by the provisions of unjust enrichment - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund - negative price variation - assessee issued the credit ...

Refund Claim Approved: No Unjust Enrichment as Duty Incidence Not Passed to Buyers in Credit Note Case.

February 1, 2014

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Refund of Customs duty - unjust enrichment - Chennai Port Trust (the buyer) had indeed borne the duty burden, as evidenced by financial records and a letter from the...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - case of appellant is that Since the transaction is of job work and not of sale there is no question of passing of incidence of duty to...

Refund - rebuttal of presumption - the word “buyer” in clause (e) to proviso to Section 11B(2) of the Act cannot be restricted to the first buyer from the manufacturer....

Excess duty paid due to issuance of credit notes to dealers and stockists after clearance of goods was rejected on grounds of incidence being passed on and lack of...

Eligibility to get refund of excess duty - unjust enrichment - if the credit notes are genuine and had been acted upon resulting in neutralizing the higher incidence of...

Refund of wrongly paid Central Excise Duty on Retail Sale Price (Maximum Retail Price-MRP) - unjust enrichment - The authorities concluded that the appellant had passed...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - unjust enrichment - It is not understood when no duty was paid and only credits availed were refunded, how come a case of unjust enrichment...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - the prices were reduced retrospectively, therefore, the appellant's buyer issued debit notes to the appellant - In the absence of any...

Refund claim of duty paid on short landing of imported goods. Unjust enrichment principle inapplicable as duty amount shown as receivable in books of accounts, certified...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - value of the software is includable in the assessable value of hardware or not - The duty and the value are shown in the face of...

Refund - Unjust enrichment - burden of duty is transferred to the buyer of the goods or not - Merely CA Certificate per se cannot be the sole ground for proving that...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Simply stating that the goods were sold at a loss does not establish that the duty incidence was not passed - No refund - AT

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - merely because the Excise duty is booked as expenditure in Profit & Loss account, it cannot be said the incidence of duty has been passed on - AT

Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

Quick Updates: