Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2014 Year 2014 This

Natural justice - adjudicating authority failed to consider the ...


Adjudicating authority's oversight in ignoring appellants' submissions leads to remand; revenue to cover Rs. 10,000 costs.

February 18, 2014

Case Laws     Service Tax     AT

Natural justice - adjudicating authority failed to consider the submissions made by the appellants - Matter remanded back for fresh decision - revenue to bear cost of Rs. 10,000/- - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The CESTAT held that the revenue authorities cannot adopt an inconsistent stand in subsequent proceedings when the facts are identical, unless there is a change in law....

  2. The appellant challenged the dismissal of its application filed u/s 7 of the Code by the Adjudicating Authority. The key issues were: existence of debt and default,...

  3. Exemption from service tax - providing transportation of agricultural produce - De-novo order passed by the adjudicating authority during the pendency of the appeal -...

  4. Validity of remanding the matter to the Assessing Authority - the first appellate authority has adjudicated the controversy on merits and therefore, the tribunal, which...

  5. The appellant, a large account reseller authorized by Microsoft, received IT services from Microsoft for which payments were made. The department alleged that Microsoft...

  6. Clandestine removal - shortage of finished goods - There are force in submissions of Appellants that in the remand proceedings, adjudicating authority has not followed...

  7. Tribunal held Adjudicating Authority's order cryptic, failing to examine appellants' defense regarding legitimate procurement and supply of gold as business transaction....

  8. While permitting withdrawal of Section 9 Application, Adjudicating Authority did not grant liberty to the Appellant to reapproach the Adjudicating Authority in the event...

  9. Violation of principles of natural justice by the Adjudicating Officer/Authority in denying opportunity of hearing to appellant A.P. Parekh, who was not a member of the...

  10. Initiation of CIRP - Insufficiently stamped documents - admissible evidence or not - The decision of the Adjudicating Authority that Corporate Debtor has committed...

  11. Non-compliance with submission of Performance Bank Guarantee by the Appellant as per the Request for Resolution Plan's clause obliging the Resolution Applicant to...

  12. The CESTAT allowed the appeal by way of remand to the Adjudicating Authority. The appellant raised new grounds in the miscellaneous application which were not considered...

  13. Imported goods classified under incorrect tariff heading, appellants denied opportunity for cross-examination and access to test reports, violation of natural justice...

  14. Appellants filed claims after the cut-off date for submission of claims in the insolvency resolution process. The approved resolution plan kept such delayed claims alive...

  15. Prayer for direction for placing the Settlement Proposal submitted by the Appellant before the CoC for consideration - CoC unanimously decided to reject the proposal...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates