Appellants filed claims after the cut-off date for submission of ...

Delayed creditors' claims kept alive for 6 months as per approved resolution plan's clause binding all stakeholders.

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy

September 6, 2024

Appellants filed claims after the cut-off date for submission of claims in the insolvency resolution process. The approved resolution plan kept such delayed claims alive for six months, requiring the successful resolution applicant (SRA) to address them as per clause 18.4(v). The Adjudicating Authority correctly rejected the appellants' application, observing that their delayed claims must be considered and settled by the SRA in line with clause 18.4(v), which binds all stakeholders, including the appellants and the SRA. The appellate tribunal found no error in the Adjudicating Authority's order and disposed of the appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Appellants filed claims after the cut-off date for submission of ...

Delayed creditors' claims kept alive for 6 months as per approved resolution plan's clause binding all stakeholders.

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy

September 6, 2024

You may also like:

The case pertains to the extinguishment of claims under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, after the acceptance of the...

This case deals with the extinguishment of demands due to the non-filing of claims by the revenue during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the...

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant's claim for outstanding income tax demands against the corporate debtor could not be admitted...

The summary focuses on the approval of a resolution plan by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the limited scope of judicial review by the adjudicating authority. The...

Challenge to an approved Resolution Plan where no consideration was given to payment to an Operational Creditor. The key points are: Section 30(2)(b) mandates that...

Approval of Resolution Plan - Appellants raised several objections against the Resolution Plan, as approved by the CoC, being discriminatory towards ‘Operational...

The Appellant's claim for stamp duty was filed belatedly, around 30 months after the public notice, without any plausible reason for the delay. The Appellant failed to...

Entertainment of claims made by creditors after approval of Resolution Plan - A stakeholder cannot afford to sleep over his claims and fail to submit it on time and come...

The appellant's claim for Rs. 9.21 crores, arising from the termination of an agreement due to non-renewal of a performance bank guarantee, was not considered by the...

Implementation of the Resolution Plan and change in management and control - Demand of customs duty - The appellant did not file any claim during the insolvency process,...

Recovery of excise duty, which got extinguished on approval of resolution plan - Section 31(1) of the IBC, 2016 mandates that the resolution plan approved by the NCLT...

The NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by the Appellant challenging the approval of the resolution plan for the Corporate Debtor. The key points are: The Interim...

Power of Resolution Professional to decide or reject the claim of one or other 'Financial Creditor' or 'Operational Creditor' - once resolution plan has been approved by...

Challenge to resolution plan as approved by the CoC - Merely because there is a reduction in the claim of any creditor does not make the resolution plan fall foul of law....

Maintainability of appeal before ITAT when CIRP proceedings have been initiated - As per section 31 of the Code, resolution plan as approved by the Adjudicating...

Quick Updates: