Regular Assessment - The time gap between the date of filing of ...

Tax Notice Barred by Limitation: Exceeded 12-Month Time Limit u/s 143(2) of Income Tax Act.

March 31, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Regular Assessment - The time gap between the date of filing of return and the date of service of notice is more than 12 months - the notice is barred by limitation in terms of the time limit prescribed u/s 143(2) - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Regular Assessment - The time gap between the date of filing of ...

Tax Notice Barred by Limitation: Exceeded 12-Month Time Limit u/s 143(2) of Income Tax Act.

March 31, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 147 read with Section 144C(13) for the Assessment Year 2016-17 is quashed as barred by limitation. Except...

The notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act was issued on 15.10.2013, beyond the prescribed time limit of six months from the end of the assessment year, i.e., 30.9.2013....

Validity of the notice issued u/s. 143(2) - statutory time limit to issue notice - the AO has issued notice u/s. 143(2) on 12/10/2020 after expiry of six months from the...

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 153(1) - Period of limitation - In this case, since, the Assessing Officer cannot invoke jurisdiction u/s.144C(1) and pass draft...

Jurisdiction of the AO to frame the assessment order - Admittedly, when the ITO realized that he did not had the pecuniary jurisdiction to issue notice, he duly...

Validity of Notice issued u/s 143(2) - Defective return - Removal of defect beyond 15 days u/s 139(9) - AO should have treated the return as non-est when the assessee...

Limitation Period for issuance of notice u/s 143(2) - Scrutiny Assessment - Relevant date - after filing of the return of income, defect notice u/s 139(9) had been sent...

The ITAT held that the limitation period for issuing a notice u/s 143(2) is relevant to the financial year and assessment year. When the Assessing Officer considered the...

Validity of reopening of assessment - time limit for issue of notice u/s. 143(2) has not expired and regular assessment could have been made - the assessing officer...

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 - failure to issue notice u/s 143(2) - reopening of assessment is not valid as the Income Tax Department has power to conduct the...

Section 142(1) notice issued by non-jurisdictional officer held valid. Plain reading of Section 143(2) indicates either Assessing Officer or prescribed income-tax...

Conversion of “Limited Scrutiny” into “Complete Scrutiny” - Expanding the scope of limited scrutiny assessment without necessary approval - Since the notice under...

Notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer/Deputy Commissioner is invalid and cannot be cured. The assessment order framed u/s 143(3) based on...

Validity of reopening of assessment - No statutory notice u/s 143(2) has been served - assessee failed to comply with the notice u/s 148 of the Act within the time...

Quick Updates: