Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Disallowance of expenses on foreign ...

Penalty Confirmed for Foreign Travel Expense Disallowance u/s 271(1)(c); Assessee Failed to Justify Claims.

June 14, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Disallowance of expenses on foreign travel – assessee have not furnished any explanation nor even the primary details in support of its claim - Penalty @ 100% of the tax sought to be evaded confirmed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Disallowance of expenses on foreign ...

Penalty Confirmed for Foreign Travel Expense Disallowance u/s 271(1)(c); Assessee Failed to Justify Claims.

June 14, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of expenses of foreign Travel expenses and inter city travel expenses - Revenue has not rejected the explanation of the...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance of interest expenditure under section 43B as well as disallowance export product development expenses - Just because the assessee...

This case deals with the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, imposed for disallowance of losses on forex derivatives treated as speculative losses and...

Penalty u/ s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance on account of personnel expenses, operative expenses and finance expenses - it a “mere disallowance” of an expense does not warrant...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of excessive depreciation - cost of acquisition of wind mill - whether or not assessee is entitled to the benefit under proviso to...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – the penalty imposed for disallowing claim of expenditure on foreign education and foreign travelling cannot be upheld - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowances in the quantum assessment order - whether any concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars proved? - Tribunal directs...

The ITAT partly allowed the assessee's appeal. Travel expenses were partly disallowed by 30% considering personal element, while 70% were allowed as business expenses...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - When the matter travelled to the Tribunal, the explanation which was given by the assessee and accepted by the CIT(A) was once again examined by...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

ITAT upheld penalties imposed under s.271(1)(c) against appellant firm for multiple violations. Unexplained cash credits in partners' capital accounts violated...

Quick Updates: