Penalty on the appellant who was attending to the day-to-day ...

Penalty Imposed on Customs House Agent for Import Diversion Reduced Upon Appeal Decision.

August 27, 2014

Case Laws Customs AT

Penalty on the appellant who was attending to the day-to-day clearance work of the CHA - appellant has played an active role in import and diversion of imported goods - levy of penalty confirmed but reduced - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty on the appellant who was attending to the day-to-day ...

Penalty Imposed on Customs House Agent for Import Diversion Reduced Upon Appeal Decision.

August 27, 2014

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Revocation of Customs Broker License - Manipulation of import invoices or valuation of goods - Once a violation of CBLR Regulations is admitted, the Revenue has to...

Levy of penalty u/s 112 (a) of the Customs Act 1962 - Customs House Agent (CHA) - violation of Regulation 13 of CHALR 2004 - It is alleged that the appellant did not...

The impact of imposing penalty and purpose of reduced penalty not fulfilled - deterring the appellant from repeating the offence - Continued violation of policy...

The case involves imposition of penalty on a Customs House Agent (CHA) u/s 114 (iii) of the Customs Act 1962 for misusing drawback benefit through fraudulent exports....

Imposition of penalties u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 on Customs broker - import of used Multifunction Digital Photocopiers and Printers - it is alleged that the...

Imported material diverted to unit other than permitted unit, resulting in contravention of import-export policy provisions. Goods held liable for confiscation u/s 111...

Enhancement of penalty, levied on Employee of CHA - appellant was reckless and negligent in using the Customs House Agent Licence of his Employer. - Smuggling - red...

Whether penalty can be imposed upon the importer for some misdeeds of the employee of their clearing agent during customs clearance of their imported goods - No penalty - AT

The key points are: misdeclaration of goods by the importer cannot render the Customs House Agent (CHA) vicariously liable for penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962....

Confiscation - fine - penalty - Mis-declaring the quantity of cigarettes imported under warehouse bill of entry for re-export purpose - The customs authorities...

Quantum of penalty u/s 114 of CA - Power of Commissioner (Appeals) to reduce the penalty - It is not the case that penalties imposed under the provisions is a mandatory...

Appellate Tribunal set aside penalties imposed on licensed money exchanger for alleged illegal export of currency and import of gold. Observed no evidence of illegal...

Mis-declaration of quantity and value of goods in SEZ unit - penalty u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act 1962. Option for reduced 25% penalty u/s 114A to be extended if...

Penalty u/s 117 of the Customs Act, 1962 was levied against appellants, Customs House Agents (CHAs), for not exercising due diligence. The allegation was that appellants...

The penalty imposed u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the appellant (a Customs Broker) for abetting the clearance of undeclared/mis-declared export goods was...

Quick Updates: