Job work - supplier have not given an undertaking to the ...

Supplier's Omission of Undertaking to Commissioner Doesn't Deny Notification 214/86 Benefits.

December 9, 2014

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Job work - supplier have not given an undertaking to the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise having jurisdiction over the factory of the job worker as required in terms of the said notification - benefit of notification 214/86 cannot be denied - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Job work - supplier have not given an undertaking to the ...

Supplier's Omission of Undertaking to Commissioner Doesn't Deny Notification 214/86 Benefits.

December 9, 2014

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

SC confirmed the decision of tribunal against the assessee denying the benefit of exemption from duty on Job work - Benefit under N/N. 214/86 - As the principal...

CENVAT credit on the input used by the jobworker for the manufacture of goods on jobwork basis under Notification No.214/86-CE dated 25.03.1986 - Rule 6(3)(b) which is...

Job work - Reversal of CENVAT Credit - Even though the goods manufactured under Notification 214/86- CE, the CENVAT Credit in respect of inputs used in the said goods is...

Cenvat credit - job work - input services used in the manufacture of job worked goods exempted under Notification No.214/86-CE is admissible. - AT

Job worker can avail cenvat credit while availing exemption notification no. 214/86 where principal is paying duty on such goods

Duty liability of Job worker - notwithstanding the fact that the process fabrics are not included in Notification 214/86, the job-worker is not liable to discharge...

Benefit of N/N. 214/86 - job work - as principal manufacturer has exported the goods under bond which means that duty is leviable on such goods but is not being paid for...

Cenvat Credit - Denial of input service credit in the hands of Job worker who is availing the benefit of exemption notification no. 8/2005 ST and 214/86 CE and did not...

CENVAT credit - when the job worker has factually paid the duty and when as per the N/N. 214/86, the appellant supplier, who sends the goods for job work is responsible...

Benefit of exemption Notification No. 61/86-C.E., dated 10-2-1986 - Benefit to driver's seats meant for hydraulic excavators - demand within the normal period of...

CESTAT held that appellant was entitled to benefit under N/N. 94/96-Cus for imported goods that were initially exported and returned. While the adjudicating authority...

Levy of Penalty - disallowance of CENVAT Credit - Only for the reason that VAL instead of contesting the show cause notice went for settlement before the Settlement...

SSI exemption - denial of benefit of Job work - The requirement of declaration under N/N. 214/86, is not a mere facility. The declaration serves the purpose of shifting...

Job work - N/N. 214/86 dated 25.03.1986 - declaration/ certificate by the principle manufacturer not filed - double benefit of exemption on the same raw material is not...

Availability of cenvat credit on the services availed by job worker exclusively manufacturing the goods on behalf of respondent while availing exemption under...

Quick Updates: