Dishonor of cheque - no clear case was made out that at the ...

Directors Contest Liability in Cheque Dishonor Case; Lack of Clear Evidence Leads to High Court Remand.

December 31, 2014

Case Laws Companies Law SC

Dishonor of cheque - no clear case was made out that at the material time, the Directors were not in charge of and were not responsible for the conduct of the business of the company by referring to or producing any uncontrovertible or unimpeachable evidence which is beyond suspicion or doubt or any totally acceptable circumstance - matter remanded back to HC - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Dishonor of cheque - no clear case was made out that at the ...

Directors Contest Liability in Cheque Dishonor Case; Lack of Clear Evidence Leads to High Court Remand.

December 31, 2014

Case Laws Companies Law SC

You may also like:

Dishonour of cheque case - petitioner-accused failed to deposit the amount despite existence of legally enforceable debt/liability. No evidence led to rebut presumption...

Dishonor of cheque - presumption that cheque was issued in discharge of legal liability, burden on accused to prove contrary. Supreme Court observations: While deciding...

Dishonor of Cheque - Vicarious liability of Director - The primary liability in a cheque bounce case where cheque has been issued on behalf of the company is upon the...

Dishonor of cheque - denial of issuance of cheque and signatures - This court is convinced and satisfied that complainant has successfully proved by leading cogent and...

Dishonour of Cheque - Vicarious liability - petitioner is an Independent Non-Executive Director - - the petitioner was appointed as Additional Director and resigned as...

Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of director - cheque was issued prior to the date of director joining the company - The petitioners have failed to bring on...

Dishonor of Cheque - liability of a Director of a company - vicarious liability - It is clear from the perusal of the complaint that there is no specific averment that...

HC ruled that a Managing Director cannot be held vicariously liable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act for a dishonored cheque that was not drawn by their...

Dishonour of cheque - vicarious liability in criminal law - The SC interpreted Section 7 of the NI Act to identify the "drawer" as the individual issuing the cheque,...

Dishonor of Cheque - insufficiency of funds - It cannot be stated that the respondent has failed to prove that the cheque in question was not dishonoured for...

Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of director - The petitioners argued that they had resigned from their directorship well before the cheque was issued and could...

In a case concerning dishonor of cheques u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the Court upheld the conviction and sentence. The accused admitted issuing cheques...

Dishonour of Cheque - Liability of a Director - principles of vicarious liability - petitioner had already resigned on 15.03.2014 as Director of the Company and was...

Dishonor of Cheque - drawer of cheque - Vicarious liability - From the bare reading of Section 138 of the N.I. Act, it transpires that the liability of the drawer of the...

Dishonor of Cheque - Unless the contrary is proved, it is presumed that the holder of a cheque received the cheque of the nature referred to in Section 138 of the Act...

Quick Updates: