Non-est return of income - Assessee had never applied for PAN, ...

Assessee's Unverified Return Deemed Invalid Without PAN; Considered Anonymous Submission with Fictitious Details.

February 3, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Non-est return of income - Assessee had never applied for PAN, the return of income was not verified and the return being not filed by the Assessee stand established and the return of income filed has to be treated as a scrap of paper filed by anonymous person reflecting fictitious income, assets and liabilities. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Non-est return of income - Assessee had never applied for PAN, ...

Assessee's Unverified Return Deemed Invalid Without PAN; Considered Anonymous Submission with Fictitious Details.

February 3, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Processing of invalid return u/s 143(1) - Denial of exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) - non-filing of ITR-V within 120 days made the assessee’s return as ‘invalid’ being...

Non considering the revised return filed by the assessee for rectifying the mistake in claim of depreciation - In this case, the original return was not filed under...

The High Court quashed the impugned orders, holding that Section 206AA, mandating 20% TDS rate for invalid PAN, was not applicable. The vendor had linked his PAN with...

Income assessed in hands of Appellant as Representative Assessee. No credit for prepaid taxes availed by beneficiaries. JCIT(A) directed AO to verify claim of prepaid...

Validity of return filed manually - The provisions of section 292B also comes to the rescue of the Assessee in as much as the return filed cannot be invalid merely by...

The ITAT Chennai considered a case involving a Best Judgment Assessment conducted u/s. 144 due to the assessee's failure to file a return within the specified time u/s....

The ITAT held that the limitation period for issuing a notice u/s 143(2) is relevant to the financial year and assessment year. When the Assessing Officer considered the...

The issue pertained to the validity of filing a revised return after the prescribed time limit. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order, stating that after the...

The assessee, a charitable trust enjoying exemption u/s 11 since 1954, was denied exemption by the Assessing Officer during reassessment proceedings on the grounds that...

Reopening of assessment - unexplained source of credit card expenditure - return filing under wrong PAN - AO had only remedy under the provisions of the Act to issue...

Reopening of assessment after expiry of four years due to deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) was found invalid. The Assessing Officer (AO) failed to establish that the...

Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - assessee has a strategic investment in one of the group concerns in which the assessee held 17.20% shareholding - The benefit is not...

Filling of ITR quoting wrong PAN - this complex issue is liable to be examined by the Income Tax Commissioner / respondent No.1 considering the practical problem which...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the revised return of income filed by the assessee cannot be treated as invalid by the Assessing Officer (AO). Since the AO...

Defective return - filing of belated return to seek refund - The returns filed by the assessee was wrongly declared by the Income tax Department as invalid return u/s...

Quick Updates: