Penalty under Section 271-D - firm had accepted payments from ...

Firm Penalized u/s 271-D, Relief Granted by Section 273B; Questions Raised on Section 269-SS Applicability.

February 6, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Penalty under Section 271-D - firm had accepted payments from the partners - applicability of the provisions of Section 269-SS - Section 273B of the Act would come to the aid and help of the respondent-assessee - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty under Section 271-D - firm had accepted payments from ...

Firm Penalized u/s 271-D, Relief Granted by Section 273B; Questions Raised on Section 269-SS Applicability.

February 6, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Taxability of the remuneration received from the partnership firm and interest on capital contribution made by the partner of the firm in the absence of any business...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

The case involved a dispute over penalty imposition u/ss 271(1)(c) versus 271(1B) for additions related to estimated income from share trading transactions. The...

Professional misconduct by CA - Liability of the Engagement partner with audit firm - Acceptance of the Audit Engagement - The NFRA concluded that the audit firm and the...

Dishonor of Cheque - legally enforceable liability of a non-existent partnership firm - dissolution of partnership firm - obligation upon the partners - The question of...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Penalty u/s. 271(l)(c) - The words may direct that such person shall pay by way of penalty in section 271 leave a certain amount of discretion in imposition of penalty...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(a) – reasonable cause for late filing of return – question of mens rea does not arise or require consideration when we examine the question of penalty...

Penalty u/s 271 AAB or u/s 271 (1)(c) - concealment on income - as per clause (2) of section 271AAB, no penalty under the provisions of clause (c) of sub-section (1) of...

Penalty proceedings against firm and partners u/s 271(1)(c) – the amounts invested in the Fixed Deposit Receipts belongs to the firm and the income also belong to the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

Status of assessee as "AOP" instead of "partnership firm" - The assessee firm was comprised of four individual partners who were representing their respective firms -...

The firm is succeeded by the company, therefore, the cost of acquisition of the company would be as that of acquisition of the firm. The valuation of land and assets of...

SSI exemption - There is no question of extending separate SSI exemption limit to each partner of a firm or to different firms being run by the same person especially in...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - Emphasizing the principles outlined by the Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal reaffirmed the importance of...

Quick Updates: